Eugene Lang

Opinion: Eugene Lang on Ontario’s austerity budget with heart

March 28, 2012

On Tuesday the Liberal government tabled its long-awaited budget to wrestle the province’s eye-watering deficit to the ground and avert a fiscal meltdown in Ontario. The budget sets out a path to deficit elimination within five years. Predictably, it is already being assailed by the right as too little too late, and by the left — embodied to a large degree in the public sector unions — as draconian and regressive.

In fact, as austerity budgets go, this is among the most progressive we’ve seen in this country — meaning the fiscal tightening falls mostly on those who can afford to take a financial hit, rather than those who cannot. This ensures the budget will pass the legislature with help from the NDP, even though their public service union supporters are rejecting it outright.

What are some of the budget’s progressive features?

For starters, the government is refraining from following through with its much trumpeted corporate tax cuts. This will save $1.5 billion over the next three years.

Even more significantly, the government is not cutting benefits to the lowest-income, most vulnerable Ontarians, opting instead to merely slow the growth of these transfers (The Ontario Child Benefit, Ontario’s signature anti-poverty measure, will continue to grow through 2014 but at a slower rate). Some social assistance benefits will be frozen but there are no planned cuts, though this is a favourite target of previous governments.

This approach to the disadvantaged is not only progressive but politically courageous. Low-income people — who exhibit chronic low-voter turnout syndrome — cannot be counted on to vote in large numbers and return the premier to office at the next election, nor will they be advancing a spirited defence of his progressive impulses in the op-ed pages and on the talk shows.

Another progressive-minded reform in this budget is its requirement that relatively well-off seniors — those who have an income of $100,000 per year or more or couples with incomes of $160,000 or more — pay higher deductibles for their prescription drugs. Income testing social benefits is about as progressive as one can get and has been a hallmark of Canadian social policy at the federal and provincial level for two decades now. It is long overdue in this case.

The biggest cuts in the McGuinty budget are in respect to the salaries, pensions and other benefits in the broad public sector — including teachers, doctors and nurses — who have seen their wages and benefits rise significantly in recent years, and who, frankly, can afford to contribute something to help the province solve its fiscal problems. Doctors’ salaries, for example, have increased more than $5 billion over the past eight years, and now account for 23 per cent of total health costs.

Basically, the government plans to cap the wage and benefits bill of the broad public sector at its current level, once collective agreements run out, and keep it that way for a few years to flatten the compensation cost curve. This move does not add up to draconian, regressive austerity, as the public sector unions are implying. Anyone who thinks it does should consider that the federal government, which has a far less serious fiscal situation than Queen’s Park, is about to “surplus” 20,000 to 30,000 public servants in the name of austerity.

And if the public sector unions think they will get support from Ontarians in their looming fight with Queen’s Park, they can think again. In contrast to the public sector, most Ontarians have seen almost no real wage gains for years, have seen defined benefit pension plans go the way of the dodo, and are acutely aware of these wage and pension disparities.

Some might counter this analysis by arguing if the government was really progressive it would raise income taxes on “the rich” to help solve the fiscal crisis. But we know that increasing taxes on incomes in a weak economy, and thereby depressing consumer demand, is not the path to growth. And as for business taxes, the government’s decision to hold corporate tax rates at their current level rather than cutting them further (as was planned) or raising them, seems a balanced and progressive approach given the province’s anemic economy.

Dalton McGuinty’s “austerity with a human face” budget is by no means perfect. Its deficit elimination target is based on steadily increasing GDP growth projections that might not materialize. Any growth forecast more than a year out in this uncertain global economic environment is dubious. And the government’s health-care restraint plan lacks convincing detail about how it would flatten that cost curve.

But when compared to the austerity budgets of other governments in this country over the past 20 years, McGuinty’s plan gets pretty good marks on the progressive scorecard. The public sector and their unions need to acknowledge that fact.

Ottawa Citizen, March 29, 2012

 

Related Content

Opinion: Why the US and Europe must stand together

President Obama’s trip to Europe is an opportunity to build on the vision he outlined in his West Point speech last week, and to set out a plan to renew the transatlantic relationship. This backbone of an alliance of liberal democracies across the globe, and the foundation of the post-war order, faces fresh challenges today. Over the past few years, though, this alliance has suffered from neglect which is troubling, as the inexorable triumph of liberal democracy is not inevitable – it requires constant work and vigilance.

Global Progress: Making Progressive Politics Work

“Making Progressive Politics Work: A Handbook of Ideas” is a collection of essays from the organizations and thinkers that are a part of Global Progress, an international exchange of ideas that will fuel the creation and implementation of progressive policies around the world. The handbook, organized and published by the U.K.-based Policy Network. Divided into two sections – Future Wealth Creation, and Jobs, Wages and Skills of the Future – the publication is required reading for Canadian progressives.

Analysis: Who is Matteo Renzi?

At just 39 years of age, Matteo Renzi became Italy’s youngest-ever prime minister in late February. The dramatic events that led to this meteoric rise are nothing new for Renzi. Over the course of his relatively short political career, the former lawyer and regional counselor earned the nickname “il Rottomatore”—meaning “the bulldozer” or “the demolition man”—thanks to his reputation for taking on the establishment and pushing through political reforms.

Opinion: It’s not unemployment, it’s underemployment

As short as 20 years ago, our combined attainment of education, work experience, and connections would place many young Canadians on a secure career track that would allow us to pay back our loans, save for a house, and contribute to the overall productivity of this great country. Today, that’s more or less not the case, and an increasing number of young Canadians are caught in a veritable limbo state of underemployment.

Summer Reading: 10 infographics you should see

We love infographics at Canada 2020 – and there’s no better time to browse and read them then over the long summer office hours.
Here’s 10 online features from The Guardian, The Economic Policy Institute, The White House and more than you should catch up on. Topics include tracking and comparing national carbon outputs, measuring exactly how inequality is rising in North America and answering what makes Canadians sick.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Site by Carbure
css.php